E-ISSN:2349-3275
P-ISSN:2349-5502

Review Article

Hepatitis B

Biomedical Review-Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science

2014 Volume 1 Number 1
Publisherwww.medresearch.in

Magnitude of Hepatitis-B in India: Role of Hepatitis B Vaccination

Patel U.1*, Gedam D.2

1* Umesh Patel, Associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, L N Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

2 D Sharad Gedam, Professor, Department of Pediatrics, L N Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Hepatitis B Infection is most prevalent chronic infection in India. It is associated with Hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic carrier. It is also responsible for chronic hepatitis and hepatic failure in large number of population. It is almost more than a decade Hepatitis B vaccination was included in National Immunization Programme (NIP). Still hepatitis B continues to be a major health Issue. In this review article we have discussed about role of vaccination in Hepatitis B infection in Indian scenario.

Keywords: Hepatitis B, Vaccination, Chronic carrier, Prevalence of Hepatitis B

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Umesh Patel, Associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, L N Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Email:
Umesh Patel, D Sharad Gedam, Magnitude of Hepatitis-B in India: Role of Hepatitis B Vaccination. Biomed Rev J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2014;1(1):27-31.
Available From
https://www.biomedicalreview.in/magnitude-of-hepatitis-b-in-india-role-of-hepatitis-b-vaccination-review-article

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2014-04-28 2014-04-29 2014-05-06 2014-05-13 2014-05-20
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Nil Nil Yes 16%

© 2014by Umesh Patel, D Sharad Gedamand Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Viral hepatitis continues to be a major public health problem in India. It is caused by different hepatotropic viruses like Hepatitis A, B, C, D and E. Nearly 290,000 cases of viral hepatitis were reported in India in 2013. Since 1955, several epidemics of hepatitis have been reported [1-5]. Although feco-orally transmitted hepatitis A (HAV) and hepatitis E (HEV), are highly endemic in India, hepatitis E has been responsible for most of the epidemic [1-5]. But recently outbreaks of hepatitis A have been also reported from the country. Different studies shows that HEV is responsible for acute liver failure in 30-70% cases [6, 7]. In pediatric population, hepatitis A is the predominant etiological agent for the cases of viral hepatitis.

Hepatitis viruses B (HBV), D (HDV) and C (HCV), which predominantly transmit through the parenteral route, pose a serious “silent epidemic” challenge to India. Infected persons are unaware of their chronic carrier status, and continue to infect others for decades and ultimately increase burden on health care system with expenses of treating liver failures, chronic liver diseases, and cancers. Despite the availability of the various serological test (for Hepatitis A, B, C, D and E) commercially, in 30-40 per cent of the cases of viral hepatitis, cause remain unknown. Hepatits G virus, Sen Virus (sen V) and TT virus (TTV) could be cases of unclassified viral hepatitis [31].

In India, HBV is second most common cause of acute hepatitis after HEV. About 12.5-21 per cent of the cases of acute viral hepatitis are due to hepatitis B infection and 40 per cent of the cases of subacute hepatic failure as well. Estimated point prevalence of HBV is 3.7%. India is considered “intermediate level” of HBV endemicity. Every year, one million Indians are at risk for HBV and about 100,000 die from HBV infection. In our country, of the 25 million infants born every year, over one million run the lifetime risk of developing chronic HBV infection Though HBV is the major cause of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and liver cancers in India, about 20% of them are also associated with HCV infection. Dual infection of HDV and HBV has more serious presentation of liver failures in acute infections and liver cancers in chronic infections. HBV and HCV co-infection and their coinfection with HIV is another area of concern.

Despite the presence of a substantial HBV disease burden, India has not yet embarked on a national programme for the control of this infection.

In India, the frequency of HBV infection has been studied in 4 distinct population groups: (i) general population, (ii) blood donor’s pregnant women, (iii) subjects at high risk of acquiring HBV infection, and (iv) patients with various liver diseases.

Table 1: Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity among general population

Author (Year) Place Number Prevalance
Hills et al. (1970) [8] West Bengal 100 0.00
Sama et al. (1973) [9] Delhi 952 0.10
Pal et al. (1973) [10] Chandigarha 1461 1.60
Sama et al. (1973) [11] Delhi 879 2.74
Shanmugham et al. (1973) [12] Vellore 741 4.2
Dutt et al. (1972) [13] Delhi 796 2.6
Singhni et al. (1990) [14] Vellore 8569 0.7-3.8
Elavia et ai. (1991) [15] Mumbai 10433 2.02
Irshad et al. (1994) [16] Delhi 20435 2.60
Nijhawan et al. (1997) [17] Jaipur 69330 2.1-3.1
Choudhury et al. (2005) [18] West Bengal 7653 2.97

This table shows that prevalence of hepatitis B in different studies is 0.1-4.2% in general population. The HBsAg positivity rates among pregnant women is slightly higher than general population [19, 20, 21]. Further, all these studies were point prevalence studies and did not meet the defining criterion for HBsAg carrier—HBsAg positivity lasting for at least 6 months. Keeping in mind, false positive and false negative test result, calculated true HBsAg positivity rate might lie between 1-2% [22]. However, based on studies in blood donors and the general population, we still believe that the prevalence rate for HBsAg lies between 2% and 4%.

High risk populations: In patients with Thalassemia and Haemophilia, HBsAg and anti-HBs positivity rates are much higher than general population. Different studies shows that HBsAg positivity is between 6%–60% and anti-HBsAg is between29%– 70% [23- 25]. Among professional blood donors HBsAg has been reported between 15%–20% [26]. However, among healthcare workers, HBsAg positivity has been reported to be 1.7%–40% [27, 28]. Kamlesh Sarkar et al. in 2004 found in their study that 23.3% commercial sex workers were HBsAg positive [29]. Household contacts, particularly spouses and children of


persons with chronic HBV infection, are known to be at an increased risk of acquiring HBV infection [30]. Therefore, such household contacts need to be screened for HBV infection and preventive steps taken if they are not already infected.

Prevention and control: Liver disease due to HBV infection is considered major public health problem, because it is the fourth or fifth most important cause of mortality in the most productive period of life, between 15-45 years of age. There is no safe and effective drugs which specifically acts against hepatitis viruses, protects from damage and stimulates liver functions and helps in hepatic regeneration. The use of available anti-viral drugs like lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavie, telbivudine, tenofovir, Foscarnet, Ribaverin and others have not yielded adequate and satisfactory success. Only interferons and pegylatet interferon have shown some beneficial results. However, the prohibitive cost, prolonged treatment and side-effects have restricted their use.

Prevention of acute and chronic HBV infection and elimination of HBV transmission in all age groups is most effectively achieved through hepatitis B vaccination. WHO recommends routine infant vaccination along with catch-up immunization for adolescents and high risk populations? India introduced universal immunization against hepatitis B in 10 states in the year 2002, and in 2011, scaled up this operation countrywide. Recently a pentavalent vaccine, which also protects against HBV, has been introduced in some states. The HBV vaccine also protects from HDV infection..The national strategy to eliminate HBV transmission has four components:

  1. Prevention of perinatal HBV infection through maternal screening and post-exposure prophylaxis of newborns of HBsAg-positive mothers;
  2. Hepatitis B vaccination of all infants to prevent infection in childhood and at later ages;
  3. Vaccination of all adolescents not previously vaccinated to prevent infection in this ag group and at later ages;
    Vaccination of adults and adolescents in groups at increased risk for infection.

Promoting safe blood supply, safe injections and safe sex are other recommended preventive measures. Universal hepatitis B vaccination

provide long term protection. A 3-dose course induces protective antibody concentrations in >95% of healthy infants, children, and adolescents and in >90% of healthy adults [32, 33]. The minimum spacing of doses is 4 weeks between doses 1 and 2, 8 weeks between doses 2 and 3, and 16 weeks between doses 1 and 3[34]. Vaccination coverage among adults at occupational risk for HBV infection has successfully reduced infection incidence by >90%.

he conventional vaccination schedule of 2 doses at 1 month interval followed by a third dose 6 months after the first (0-1-6) does not coincide with the EPI immunization program of Government of India. The studies shows that GMT (Geometric mean titer) after 3 dose of hepatitis B vaccination is variable for different schedule [35, 38, 39]. The GMT of Anti HBs obtained in infants using 2, 4 and 6 months and 0, 1 and 6 months schedules were however higher than EPI schedule.

Table 2: Geometric Mean Titers in Infants Vaccinated against Hepatitis B by Different Vaccination schedules

Schedule Study Geometric mean titers (mIu/ml)
6, 10 and 14 weeks Gomber et al. [35] 224
2, 4 and 6 months Giamanco et al [38] 949
0, 1 and 6 months Safary et al.[39] 4023

The significance of post vaccination titers in providing long term protection is unclear but some of the expert suggests that infants who achieved higher Anti HBs titers were likely to be protected better in later years than infants with low titers [36, 37].

Conclusion

  1. Dhamdhere MR, Nadkarni MG. Infectious hepatitis at Aurangabad. Report of an outbreak. Indian J Med Sci 1962 Dec; 16:1006–15.
  2. Bhattacharji LM, Saha AL, Sampathkumaran MA, De SK. Investigation of an outbreak of infectious hepatitis in a small town in West Bengal during July–October, 1960. Indian J Med Res. 1963 May; 51:550–62.
  3. Pattanayak S, Singha P, Pal SC, Rao CK, Shrivastav JB. An outbreak of infectious hepatitis in Siliguri, 1966. Indian J Med Res 1968 Nov; 56(11):1605–16.

  1. Naik SR, Aggarwal R, Salunke PN, Mehrotra NN. A large waterborne viral hepatitis E epidemic in Kanpur, India. Bull World Health Organ 1992; 70(5):597–604.
  2. Ray R, Aggarwal R, Salunke PN, Mehrotra NN, Talwar GP, Naik SR. Hepatitis E virus genome in stools of hepatitis patients during large epidemic in north India. Lancet 1991Sep; 338(8770):783–4.
  3. Nanda SK, Yalcinkaya K, Panigrahi AK, Acharya SK, Jameel S, Panda SK. Etiological role of hepatitis E virus in sporadic fulminant hepatitis. J Med Virol 1994 Feb; 42(2):133–7.
  4. Acharya SK, Panda SK, Saxena A, Gupta SD. Acute hepatic failure in India: A perspective from the East. J Gastroenterol Hepatol.2000 May; 15(5):473–9.
  5. Hillis WD, Pattanayak S, Arora DD. Detection of Australia antigen in human viral hepatitis. Indian J Med Res. 1970 Sep; 58(9):1172–6.
  6. Sama SK, Anand S, Malaviya AN, Gandhi PC, Tandon BN. Australia-SH antigen in normal population and patients of viral hepatitis in Delhi. Indian J Med Res 1971; 59:64–8.
  7. Pal SR, Dutta DV, Choudhury S, Jolly JG, Deodhar SD, Samant AK, et al. Serum hepatitis (SH) antigen amongst patients with liver diseases and voluntary blood donors—A prospective study. Indian J Med Res 1973; 61:1784–98.
  8. Sama SK, Sarla PK, Gera KL. Hepatitis associated antigen amongst blood donors in Delhi by counterelectrophoresis. Indian J Med Res 1973; 61:406–10.
  9. Shanmugham RV, John TJ, Hill PG, Carman RH. Comparative sensitivity of cross-over electrophoresis and complement fixation test for the detection of Australia antigen. Indian J Med Res 1973; 61:521–4.
  10. Dutta RN, Mahammed GS. Incidence of Australia antigen in voluntary and professional blood donors and also in cases of viral hepatitis. Indian J Med Res 1972; 60:1774–8.
  11. Singhvi A, Pulimood RB, John TJ, Babu PG, Samuel BU, Padankatti T, et al. The prevalence of markers for hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency viruses,
  1. malarial parasites and microfilaria in blood donors in a large hospital in south India. J Trop Med Hyg 1990; 93:178–82.
  2. Elavia AJ, Banker DD. Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and its subtypes in high risk group subjects and voluntary blood donors in Bombay. Indian J Med Res 1991; 93:280–5.
  3. Irshad M, Joshi YK, Acharya SK, Tandon BN. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in healthy persons in North India. Natl Med J India 1994; 7:210–12.
  4. Nijhawan S, Rai RR, Sharma D, Saxena HB. HBsAg prevalence in blood donors in Jaipur. Indian J Gastroenterol 1997; 16:162
  5. Chowdhury A, Santra A, Chakravorty R, Banerji A, al S, Dhali GK, et al. Community based epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in West Bengal, India: Prevalence of hepatitis B e antigen negative infection and associated viral variants. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 20:1712–20
  6. Sehgal A, Gupta I, Sehgal R, Ganguly NK. Hepatitis B vaccine alone or in combination with anti-HBs immunoglobulin in the perinatal prophylaxis of babies born to HBsAg carrier mothers. Acta Virol. 1992 Aug; 36(4):359–66.
  7. Gill HH, Majumdar PD, Dhunjibhoy KR, Desai HG. Prevalence of hepatitis B e antigen in pregnant women and patients with liver disease. J Assoc Physicians India. 1995 Apr; 43(4):247–8.
  8. Prakash C, Sharma RS, Bhatia R, Verghese T, Datta KK. Prevalence in North India of hepatitis B carrier state amongst pregnant women. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1998; 29:80–4.
  9. Phadke A, Kale A. HBV carrier rate in India. Indian Pediatr 2002; 39:787–8.
  10. Mital MK, Vij JC, Talukdar B, Sachdev HP, Saini L. Prevalence of hepatitis-B virus markers in multitransfused thalassemic patients. Indian Pediatr 1988; 25:161–5.
  11. Choudhry VP, Acharya SK. Hepatitis B, C and D viral markers in multitransfused thalassemic children: Longterm complications and present management. Indian J Pediatr 1995; 62:655–68.

  1. Jaiswal SP, Chitnis DS, Jain AK, Inamdar S, Porwal A, Jain SC. Prevalence of hepatitis viruses among multitransfused homogenous thalassaemia patients. Hepatol Res 2001; 19:247–53.
  2. Irshad M. Singh YN, Acharya SK. HBV-status in professional blood donors in North India. Trop Gastroenterol. 1992; 13:112–14.
  3. Duseja A, Arora L, Masih B, Singh H, Gupta A, Behera D, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus––prevalence and prevention in health care workers. Trop Gastroenterol 2002; 23:125–6.
  4. Ganju SA, Goel A. Prevalence of HBV and HCV infection among health care workers (HCWs). J Commun Dis 2000; 32:228–30.
  5. Sarkar K, Ganguly DN, Baisali B, Saha MK, Bhattacharya SK. Hepatitis B infection, Estern India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Jul; 10(7):1341-2.