Research Article
Public Health
Volume 10 Number 1 Title Jan-Dec 2023
E-ISSN:2349-3275 P-ISSN:2349-5502 www.biomedicalreview.in

Perception of Pre-Marital Sex, Courtship among Osun State University Undergraduates, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria

Abdulazeez A O1, Adeyemi O2*, Abayomi O3, Grace B4, Halima U Y5, Odunayo G A6, Jennifer O7

Perception of Pre-Marital Sex, Courtship among Osun State University Undergraduates, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Pre-marital sex, a form of sexual activity practiced by unmarried individuals, has seen growing acceptance in western countries. Previously, it was considered a moral dilemma, prohibited by many cultures and religions. However, the acceptance of pre-marital sex has become more widespread.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the perceptions, practices, and factors associated with pre-marital sex and courtship among undergraduates at Osun State University in Osogbo, Osun State.

Methodology: This descriptive study employed a multi-stage sampling technique to select respondents from Osun State University's main campus. The sample size was calculated using Leslie Kish's formula, resulting in 387 valid survey responses. Data collection involved self-administered semi-structured questionnaires comprising four sections. Data were coded, input, and analysed using SPSS v21.

Results: The mean age of respondents was 19.19±2.17 years, with the majority falling in the 18 to 24 age group. Approximately 52% of respondents held a positive view of pre-marital sex and courtship. Regarding courtship, a significant portion (88.3%) believed that individuals spending time together were involved in courting. Analysis of factors associated with pre-marital sex revealed that peer pressure (90.4%), Internet exposure (86.7%), access to pornography (83.9%), and substance use (82.9%) were the prominent contributors to pre-marital sexual behaviour among undergraduate students.

Conclusion: The study suggests that parents should actively monitor and visit their children while they are at universities. Providing essential materials and creating a comfortable environment can help protect them from succumbing to peer pressure. It is recommended that undergraduate students avoid engaging in pre-marital sex. While many students view courtship as a normal practice, it can still contribute to pre-marital sexual activity.

Keywords: Pre-Marital Sex, Courtship, Influences, University, Undergraduates

1 Olayiwola Abdulazeez A, Department of Public Health, Faculty Of Basic Medical Sciences Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

2* Omoge O Adeyemi, Department of Public Health, Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

3 Olarinmoye Abayomi, Department of Public Health, Faculty Of Basic Medical Sciences Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

4 Bezard Grace, Deartment Of Public Health, Faculty Of Basic Medical Sciences Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

5 Yahaya Halima U, Department of Public Health, Faculty Of Basic Medical Sciences Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

6 Aborisade Odunayo G, Department of Public Health, Faculty Of Basic Medical Sciences Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

7 Osolase Jennifer, Department of Public Health, Faculty Of Basic Medical Sciences Adeleke University, Ede, Osun, Nigeria.

Email
Cite this Article
Abdulazeez A O, Adeyemi O, Abayomi O, Grace B, Halima U Y, Odunayo G A, Jennifer O. Perception of Pre-Marital Sex, Courtship among Osun State University Undergraduates, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria. Biomed Rev J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2023;10(1):17-22.
Available From
https://www.biomedicalreview.in/perception-of-pre-marital-sex-courtship-among-osun-state-university-undergraduates-osogbo-osun-state-nigeria-research-article
Meta History
2023-12-29 Submission Recieved
2024-01-01 1st review
2024-01-08 2nd review
2024-01-15 3rd review
2024-01-22 Accepted and Published
Declaration
9% Plagiarism. Authors state no conflict of interest. Non Funded. The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Evidence in Context

What Know: Pre-marital sex, a form of sexual activity practiced by unmarried individuals, has seen growing acceptance in western countries. Previously, it was considered a moral dilemma, prohibited by many cultures and religions.

What New: The study suggests that parents should actively monitor and visit their children while they are at universities. Providing essential materials and creating a comfortable environment can help protect them from succumbing to peer pressure.

To view

© 2023 by Abdulazeez A O, Adeyemi O, Abayomi O, Grace B, Halima U Y, Odunayo G A, Jennifer O and Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Biomedical Review
Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science

Introduction

Pre-marital Commonly, this concept "sex before marriage" refers to people who are supposedly not yet of marriageable age or to adults who are having sexual relations before they eventually get married (Ramesh,et al, 2008). Merriam Webster claims that according to the dictionary, courtship is the amount of time when people engage in love activities that potentially result in marriage, or the time frame during which such activities take place. Sex before marriage is sexual behaviour engaged in by single people. In the past, having sex before getting married is seen as a moral dilemma that many cultures forbade and that many people regarded to be sin in many religions, although it has gained wider acceptance across the board since the 1960s, especially in Western nations. Several research have been conducted on how individual perceives courtship considering its impact on pre-marital sex (Bogle, 2008).

According to these research, young adults—both male and female—frequently participate in casual sex, often known as "campus courtship" or "hooking up," as opposed to the traditional courtship model, which forbids pre-marital sex. A sexual contact, including kissing and having intercourse, is widely referred to as "hooking up," especially amongst young men and women, without suggesting a legal commitment. Premarital sex, non-marital pregnancies, and a high rate of divorce each year have all significantly altered the traditional family structure. Due to western education, courtship, a practice that has been prevalent in Nigeria for decades, gained popularity. Undergraduate courtship has changed some of the traditional male and female interactions in African society. Men had to make calls to ladies in the pre-colonial era and be invited to visit the woman's home while being strictly supervised by the family. This kind of courtship followed traditional wooing guidelines that both men and women were required to follow. However, the perception of young men and women about romance and sex before marriage has indeed been completely reshaped by western education. The university setting gives young people the chance to go out and indulge in another type of campus romance known as "hooking up" away from the watchful eyes of their families and neighbors (Hettinger, 2007).

The mass media, social media, the internet, peers, shifting family customs, money, the university setting, and other elements have influenced how young people think and engage in courtship alongside contemporary social changes. Undergraduates' sexual conduct has been influenced by this awareness of courtship, especially in relation to courtship and its relationship to premarital sex.

Material and Method

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out at Osun State University. The study was carried out with the use of a semi-structured questionnaire. The information obtained from the finished instrument was calculated and analyzed using Statistical Product for Service Solutions version 21 software.

Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in this study as data analysis strategies. To examine the data and provide answers to the study objectives, descriptive statistics like frequency distribution and mean will be used. Compound frequency distributions were used to track respondents' replies to each of the instrument's questions.

Results

Socio-Demographics Characteristics of the Respondents

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. The mean age of the respondents is 19.19±2.17, with about 50% of them are between 18-24years. More than two-thirds of the respondents were female, practiced Christianity (69.8%) and are the Yoruba (78.3%) tribe. The majority (98.5%) of the respondents were single and are 100 level (54.5%) students.

Table 1: Frequency distribution of respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics

Variablen = (387)Percentage (%)
Age(years) 
<1818247
18-2419349.9
≥25123.1
Mean±SD19.19±2.17
Gender 
Male13735.4
Female25064.6
Ethnicity  
Yoruba30378.3
Igbo5313.7
Hausa143.6
Others174.4
Religion  
Islam11529.7
Christianity27169.8
Traditional10.3
 Marital status 
Single37998.5
Married61.5
Level  
10021154.5
2008722.5
3006416.5
400184.7
50071.8
Department  
Anatomy235.9
Pharmacology266.7
Physiology338.5
Public health5414
Computer science102.6
Medical laboratory science195
Biochemistry82.1
Law71.8
Mechanical engineering82.1
Nutrition & Dietetics195.1
Radiography & radiation science266.7
Nursing123.2
Others (Zoology, Statistics, Plant Biology, MCB)14236.3
 Faculty  
Basic and Applied science3910.1
Basic Medical science6316.1
Engineering266.7
FABAMSA299.4
Health sciences4311.1
FBSS92.3
FBMS143.7
Others (BMS,CHS,LAW, College of Health)16440.6

Biomedical Review
Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science

Respondents' Perception on Pre-Marital Sex, Courtship and its Influences

Table 2 shows the respondents' perception on pre-marital sex courtship and its influence. About 78% of the respondents agreed that women and men (68.6%) should be a virgin before marriage. More than two-thirds of the respondents agreed that neither man nor woman should not have pre-marital sex. Many (71.2%) of the respondents agreed that pre-marital sex should be prohibited. About 61% of the respondents disagreed that pre-marital sex is normal for biological needs. More than half of the respondents disagreed that pre-marital sex should be acceptable if a couple falls in love and plan to marry. The majority (92.3%) of the respondents agreed that courtship is a process where partners get to know more about each other. About 70% of the respondents agreed courtship sometimes leads to pre-marital and unprotected (61.2%) sex. Many (65.2%) of the respondents agreed that courtship has ruined the lives of some students.

Figure 1 shows respondents’ perceptions towards premarital sex, courtship, and its influence. About 52% of the respondents show a positive perception towards premarital sex and courtship.

Respondents' View on Courtship Practice

Table 3 shows the respondents' views on courtship practice among them. About 62.9% of the respondents think most of the people living together are courting. The majority (88.3%) of the respondents think those that go around together are courting. More than two-thirds of the respondents believed courting can take place without any form of personal contact with the help of modern technology. Most (84.7%) of the respondents believe singing romantic love songs, reciting poems and writing letters help the courtship building. 

Figure 2 shows respondents' views on factors that lead to pre-marital sex among undergraduates. About 90% of the respondents think peer pressure has led to pre-marital sex among undergraduate students compared to the Internet (86.7%), Pornography (83.9%), Drugs (82.9%), living arrangement (71.5%), family background (68.8%) and Pocket money (66.5%)

Table 2: Frequency distribution of respondents’ perception on pre-marital sex, courtship and its influence

VariableAgree(%)Neutral(%)Disagree(%)
Woman should be a virgin before marriage296(77.9%)15(3.9%)69(18.2%)
Man should be a virgin before marriage260(68.6%)21(5.5%)98(25.9%)
Neither a man or woman should have pre-marital sex263(69.7%)18(4.8%)96(25.5%)
Pre-marital sex should be absolutely prohibited270(71.2%)87(23%)22(5.8%)
Pre-marital sex normal because it is a kind of biological need119(31.4%)30(7.9%)230(60.7%)
Pre-marital sex is acceptable if a couple fall in love135(35.6%)27(7.1%)217(57.3%)
Pre-marital sex is acceptable if he/she has only one partner125(33.2%)30(8%)222(58.9%)
Pre-marital sex is acceptable if the couple plan to marry in the future138(36.3%)28(7.4%)214(56.3%)
Courtship is a process whereby you get to know your partner350(92.3%)4(1.1%)25(6.6%)
Courtship sometimes leads to pre-marital sex267(70.4%)11(2.9%)101(26.6%)

Table 3: Frequency Distribution of Respondents View on Courtship Practice

Variablesn=381Percentage (%)
By doing the live-in couple 
Yes24662.9
No14337.1
Couples that go together for some activities
Yes34288.3
No4511.7
Courting can also take place without personal contact, especially with modern technology
Yes30177.7
No8622.3
The practice of singing romantic love songs, reciting poems, writing letters and gift-giving
Yes32884.7
No5915.3

bm_61_01.JPG
Figure 1: Respondents Perception towards Pre-Marital Sex

bm_61_02.JPG
Figure 2: Factor Leading to Pre-Marital Sex among Undergraduate

Discussion

In this study, we examined the undergraduates’ perceptions on courtship and its influence on pre-marital sex, we also ascertained how courtship is being practiced among the undergraduates and lastly, we identified the factors leasing pre-marital sex among undergraduates. A large percentage of the respondents agreed that women and men should be virgins before marriage, neither a man or woman should have pre-marital sex, premarital sex should be prohibited and shouldn’t be normal because it is a biological need, pre-marital sex should not be acceptable if a couple fall in love and plan to marry, courtship sometimes lead to premarital sex and unprotected sex and that courtship has ruined the lives of some students. This means that a higher proportion have a positive perception on premarital sex that it should be avoided.


Biomedical Review
Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science

Meanwhile on the perception of undergraduates on courtship, a higher proportion agreed that courtship sometimes leads to premarital and unprotected sex and courtship leads to the ruin of some students lives, this indicates that although there is an overall positive perception towards pre- marital sex that it should be avoided the perception on courtship indicates that courtship has a big role to play in undergraduates participating in premarital sex. It is obvious from the study that the undergraduate students show a positive perception towards premarital sex and courtship which means that pre-marital sex is a behavior that should be avoided among undergraduates in Osun State University, which is in line with a study conducted by (Hansel Teo Sze Young et. al. 2020) on the perception of premarital sex among students in a faith-based university.

This study also showed that majority of students say that those that hang around together are courting, a particularly large amount of people also says that singing romantic love songs, reciting poems, and writing letters is a method of courtship, while a lesser amount say couples that live together are also practicing courtship.

Results from the factors that influence pre-marital sex showed that peer pressure is the major contributing factor that leads undergraduate into having pre-marital sex. Following that are other factors such as pornography, drugs, internet, living arrangement, movies/television etc. these influencing factors are not peculiar to this study alone, it was also stated in another study that was conducted by (Adegboyega et. al. 2019; Omoge Adeyemi O. et al. 2022 & Adeyemi O. Omoge et al. 2023) on the influence of peer pressure on sexual behavior of undergraduates in kwara state.

Conclusion

Pre-marital sex is a practice that should be avoided by undergraduate students, though most students consider courtship as a normal practice, it is still used as a normal factor that leads them to practicing pre-marital sex. Some students especially in their teens, are mainly influenced by their peers, others by the promise of marriage which makes them fall victim of pre-marital sex. Our respondents have a positive perception on pre-marital sex, which tends to influence their courtship practices in a positive way.

References

1. Ancok, D. , Faturocbman, Soetjipto, HP (1988). PerananKeluarga, Sekolah, danand Fertility in Kenya: A Survey of Knowledge, Perceptions, and Practices. Studies in Family Planning, 22, 205-216 and Francis. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

2. Anderson, David. Towards a more effective policy response to AIDS. IUSSP Policy and Research. 1994 Paper No 4, Belgium: IUSSP. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

3. Bender, D, & Leone, B. Sexual values opposing viewpoints. San Diego: Green Haven Press. (2015). [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

4. Berihun H. Assessment of the prevalence of premarital sex and unprotected sexual practices among secondary school adolescent students in Sebeta town, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University; 2014. . [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

5. Bogle PO. Premarital sex involvement: Developmental investigation of relational correlates. Adolescence. (2008) 92, 705-987. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

6. Het inger, R. Sex isn’t that simple: The new sexuality on campus. Ney York. The Seabury Press. (2007) [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

7. Bumroongsook, S. Love and Marriage: Mate selection in Twentieth-Century Thailand. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (2013). [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

8. Chan, Wing-Tset. A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press. (2013) [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

9. Chandra-Mouli V, Camacho AV, Michaud PA. WHO guidelines on preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes among adolescents in developing countries. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5):517–22. [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

10. Cherlin, A. J. (2012) Public & Private Families. An Introduction. Boston: McGraw Hill [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

11. Courtship “Merriam-Webster. com dictionary 9 Dem 2021 definition of courtship and premaritalsexretrivedfromhttps://www. merriam-webster. com/dictionary/courtship. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. Coontz, S. (2015) Marriage, a History. How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Penguin. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Dr Musa Abdullahi&Abdullahi Umar. Factors Associated With Engaging in Pre-Marital Sex Among. The Students of University of Maiduguri. (2013). [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Ebrey, PB (2012) Women and the Family in Chinese History. London:Routledge. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

15. Goody, J. (2010) The Oriental, the Ancient, and the Primitive. Systems of Marriage and the Family in the Pre-industrial Societies of Eurasia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

16. Jayakody, R. and Vu, T. H. (2019) “Family change in Vietnam’s Red River Delta. ” In M. Barbieri and D. Bélanger, eds., Reconfiguring Families in Contemporary Vietnam. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 203-236 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

17. Jocano, FL (2018) Filipino Indigenous Ethnic Communities. Manila: Punlad. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

18. Jordan, DK (2012) “Chinese Matchmakers of Tiānjin & Táoyuán” http://wwwantro.uscd.edu/~dkjordan/meiren/ (accessed 5 Feb 2014) [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


Biomedical Review
Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science

19. Lě, T. (2018) Single Women in Vietnam. Hanoi: ThéGiói Press. . [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

20. Lori, S Ashford. 1995. "New Perspectives on Populations: Lessons from Cairo", Population Bulletin Vol. 50, No. 1 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

21. Lye, W F and C Murray. Transformations in the Highveld. The Tswana and Southern Sotho. Cape Town: David Philip. 2010 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

22. M. A. Monto; A. G. Carey (2014)."A new standard of sexual behavior? Are claim associated with the "hookup culture" Beasties and friends with benefit. The Journal of Sex Research [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

23. Mengistie Z, Wolie E, Abawa E, Ebre E, Adera A. Knowledge attitude and practice towards premarital sex and HIV/AIDS among Mizan-Tepi University students, southwest Ethiopia. Sci J public Health. 2015;3(4):592–9. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

24. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. AIDS Epidemiology In Lesotho. Maseru, Lesotho. 1997. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

25. Moore, S. A description of the diversity of kinship and marriage practices in Southeast Asia with a focus on India. The South Asianist, 3, 1: 1-8. (2014). [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

26. Mullan, B. (2014) The Mating Trade. London: Routledge. . [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

27. Omoge Adeyemi O. , Adesegun Mobolaji M. , Arogundade Ayorinde O. , Godfrey Sally G. Obi – Obasi Chiamaka S., Opadele Modurotolu M. (2022). Experiences And Attitudes Towards Sexual Harassment among Hawkers Residing in Ede Township in Osun State, Nigeria. ; [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

28. Adeyemi O. Omoge, Mobolaji M. Adesegun, Ayorinde O. Arogundade et al. Experiences and Attitudes Towards Sexual Harassment Among Hawkers Residing in Ede Township in Osun State, Nigeria, 17 October 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

29. Poulter, S. , William McClaim, J. B. K. Kaburise, J. Mugambwa and D. Milazi. 1981. Law and Population Growth in Lesotho, Lesotho: Morija Printing Works [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

30. Quah, S. R. (2019) Families in Asia. Home and Kin. London: Routledge. Straits Times (2013) “Marry me (please …?)”, Saturday, 17 August, pp. D14-D15 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

31. Regassa T, Chala D, Adeba E. Premarital sex in the last twelve months and its predictors among students of Wollega University, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26(4):351–9. [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

32. Regnerus Mark, Uecker Jeremy. How Young under graduate Meet, Mate, and Think about Marrying. Premarital Sex in America. (2011). [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

33. Salih NA, Metaferia H, Reda AA, Biadgilign S. Premarital sexual activity among unmarried adolescents in northern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Sex Reprod Healthcare. 2015;6(1):9–13. [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

34. Teferra TB, Erena AN, Kebede A. Prevalence of premarital sexual practice and associated factors among undergraduate health science students of Madawalabu university, Bale Goba, south east Ethiopia: institution based cross sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:1. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

35. Thornton, A. (1990). The Courtship Process and Adolescent Sexuality. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 239-279. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

36. Thornton, A. and Camburn, D. (1989) Religious Participation and adolescent Sexual Behavior and Attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 641-653. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

37. Thornton, A. and. Camburn, D. (1987). The Influence of the Family on Premarital Sexual Attitudes and Behavior. Demography, 24, 323-340 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

38. Trlin, A. D. , Krishnamoorthy, S. and Khoo, S-E. (1983) Premarital Sex: Differentials [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

39. Udry, J. R. and Billy, J. O. G. (1987). Initiation of Coitus in Early Adolescence. American Sociological Review, 52, 841-855 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

40. Udry,, J. R. (1988). Biological Presdispositions and Social Control in Adolescent Sexual Behavior. American Sociological Review, 53, 709-722 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

41. Uganda. Uganda Virus Research Institute. Entebbe. . [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

42. Ukor, B. (1990). Sex in Adolsecen’ looking upwards. Cross River, Cross River State Newspaper Corporation. UNICEF. (2001). A league table for teenage births in rich nations. Retrieved 10th October, 2013 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

43. UNICEF. Adolescence and youth. 4th ed. Colorado: Harper Collins Publisher; 2016. [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

44. UN. 1985. Socio-economic Differentials in Child Mortality in Developing Countries ST/ESA/SER. A/97, New York: United Nations. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

45. U. S. Teenage Women over the Past Three Decades. Family Planning Perspectives, 19, 46-53. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

46. Vogel, E. (2016) “The go-between in a developing society: The case of the Japanese marriages arranger. ” In W. J. Goode, ed., Readings on the Family and Society. Englewood-Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 72- 82 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


Biomedical Review
Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science

47. White, J. M. and Klein, D. M. (2018) Family Theories. 3rd Ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

48. Women. Family Planning Perspectives. 22, 206-214. 1982-1988. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.


Biomedical Review
Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Science